search:

the work.group home


Archive for May, 2004
31.May.2004 at 21h13m48
worker: ashley
tagged:

proposal: fort for a nephew, aged 2-8.
initial considerations: safety, security (from adults), space ship, pirate ship.

No Comments »

file file file

28.May.2004 at 01h09m16
worker: ashley
tagged: , , ,

tshirt001.jpg

should we produce some merch to push on the tour?
† continue reading merch

3 Comments »

file file file

27.May.2004 at 16h22m19
worker: ashley
tagged: ,

for the bookmark and url bar icon, do you have a preference:


or

5 Comments »

file file file

14.May.2004 at 17h47m06
worker: ashley
tagged: , ,

do you think the wrk.grp needs a slogan? for example, ‘a proactive paradigm since 2002′

7 Comments »

file file file

07.May.2004 at 15h50m02
worker: ashley
tagged: ,

presumably we are agreed that every endeavour undertaken by a member of the wrk.grp is not an endeavour of the group. the group’s mission involves a collaborative process; does this preclude any discussion of independent work? can discussion amongst the members take place without altering the scope of the projekt? If you bring a projekt before the group for feedback, i would say that it remains your work until you declare that you choose collaboration instead of comments. for instance, a suggestion that you place your screen door in a direct path to your steps does not cast the wrk.grp umbrella over your porch.
† continue reading what are the limits of the work.group?

13 Comments »

file file file

06.May.2004 at 23h13m01
worker: ashley
tagged: , , ,

our im discussion earlier today, coupled with my recent thoughts on my closing statements in the upcoming copyright lawsuit, rekindled my interest in crafting some form of constitution for the work.group. beyond the current manifesto, it would be a framework for the production of the work, rather than a declaration of its intent. i had originally intended to hack something together from the ideas behind the open source movement, as codified in the gpl, by exchanging ’software’ for ‘architecture’. however, not only is this forbidden, but my late dalliances in wiki have revealed to me that the gpl may already apply to creative endeavors as well. indeed, software is creative, as well, but i am thinking in terms of photographs, bitmaps, porch cd’s, etc. by looking over open source graphics, we find the creative commons has tackled this issue; there is even the ability to customize the license that fits our goals (my first notions). would this be something you would be interested in pursuing? Should we craft our own constitution? Should new workers have to ratify it? Should we maintain full control of the work, which seems impossible and detrimental to the field? Should things remain undefined?

No Comments »

file file file

05.May.2004 at 15h05m44
worker: ashley
tagged: , ,

happy sinko day my oh!!

tags: news mexico fun

1 Comment »

file file file


rawr! the work.group: about | contact | news ||| workers lounge: write post | site map |