rawr!

search:


projekts:

work:
5 houses secret ballot +
22h50m52 / 04.Feb.2008
worker: john

this post is to determine, by popular vote, the 5 houses that will graduate to design development. dont look until you have voted! we can pare down from the number of houses that results from the vote.

1
2
3
4
5


tagged: ,

comments:

don’t look at what?


-ashley
[ 23h01m10 | 04.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

my nominations!


-john
[ 23h04m33 | 04.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

i’m not supposed to vote on yours, just post my five?
ok?


-ashley
[ 23h06m39 | 04.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

yes, post your preferences.


-john
[ 23h09m23 | 04.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

what is the criteria? that we did a ‘good job’ on it? or that the prompt was interesting?


-ashley
[ 23h21m45 | 04.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

i used a little of both.


-john
[ 23h33m54 | 04.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

…or, entries that exhibited both properties, i should say.


-john
[ 23h44m23 | 04.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

1
2
3
4
5

would have picked this one, but you said it was done.


-ashley
[ 23h45m12 | 04.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

1. drift house
2. hider in the house
3. casa del fascio
4.
5.

pool for final 2 houses: apex predator house, house o’7 sins, 7 year house, scale house, barker house


-john
[ 23h48m53 | 04.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

should we decide or wait until gray wakes up?


-john
[ 23h49m15 | 04.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

i will go with 7 year house if you agree to barker house.


-john
[ 23h49m48 | 04.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

[quote comment="11436"]i will go with 7 year house if you agree to barker house.[/quote]
are we the only people voting? i could probably ask saul or mm to vote, but i don’t think they’ve looked at any of the houses.


-ashley
[ 23h53m07 | 04.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

saul appears to have a grasp on the work.


-john
[ 23h56m31 | 04.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

of your two picks, i guess i would go w/ barker; i don’t remember what the schemes/dwgs of scale house had to do w/ scale.
of my pix, i can’t decide between 7 sins or 7 year. 7 sins is pretty much formed up, from what i remember. i think you are opposed to apex predator, but i thought my sea-air-land scheme was pretty tight.


-ashley
[ 23h58m20 | 04.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

[quote comment="11438"]saul appears to have a grasp on the work.[/quote]
i’ll send a request to look at the last 4 or 5 in the pool; house o’7 sins, 7 year house, scale house, barker house, (apex predator house), but i don’t think i can get anyone to look at all 31 and pick 5.


-ashley
[ 23h59m47 | 04.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

i dont know what your scale drawings were, my schemes had the same spatial composition at different scales, from the inhabitable to the textural.

although i think 7-sins is already more houselike, i think the 7 year house is more seductive.

if we go with barker in the #4 spot i will let you choose the last one.


-john
[ 00h02m14 | 05.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

but i don’t think i can get anyone to look at all 31 and pick 5.

maybe you can ask your date to the clash.


-john
[ 00h03m15 | 05.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

[quote comment="11441"]

if we go with barker in the #4 spot i will let you choose the last one.[/quote]

jfx! we will do f barker!!


-ashley
[ 00h05m27 | 05.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

[quote comment="11442"]
maybe you can ask your date to the clash.[/quote]
how am i supposed to meet anyone if there is already a phe hanging on my arm?


-ashley
[ 00h06m29 | 05.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

whatever, i dont know your m.o. you or a furry from your coterie can pick the 5th dd house.


-john
[ 00h27m06 | 05.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

1. drift house
2. hider in the house
3. casa del fascio
4. barker
5. 7 year house


-ashley
[ 07h04m21 | 05.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

can you ask saul what we are supposed to do now?


-john
[ 09h45m24 | 05.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

now what?


-ashley
[ 11h04m23 | 05.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

maybe you can focus on the exhibition and i will think of some criteria to keep this work reined in.


-john
[ 11h05m33 | 05.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

hmm, i missed that saul comment; am i not getting notifications again!


-ashley
[ 11h12m06 | 05.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

whats going on here?


-john
[ 16h37m47 | 17.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

get back to work!!


-ashley
[ 16h43m40 | 17.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

on it. are we going to set a schedule for ourselves and some concrete goals?


-john
[ 16h49m39 | 17.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

are we working on all houses simultaneously, or in a certain sequence, or tag teaming?


-ashley
[ 16h51m55 | 17.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

probably in sequence? 2 weeks per house or something?


-john
[ 16h53m11 | 17.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

2 weeks! i thought we would have 6 months total? i propose that we begin work for hider-in-the house a week from today.


-ashley
[ 17h07m58 | 17.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

so 1-1/5 months per house? i will try to draught up a set list for the work since you so usefully orchestrated this whole last lump of stuff.


-john
[ 18h06m45 | 17.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

wait! maybe i meant 6 months per house? maybe we/you determine how far we are going to push them before we write the schedule? they are going to be at the level of habitat or pgon, correct?


-ashley
[ 18h10m18 | 17.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

wait! maybe i meant 6 months per house?

no.

they are going to be at the level of habitat or pgon, correct?

ideally.


-john
[ 23h35m26 | 17.Feb.2008 ] [ link ]

file

leave comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

add images to comment:

upload images (must be logged in)
add image to comment.


rawr! workers lounge: write post | photopress | site map | code snippets