top image: jt explains am/pm’s ‘banal urban series’
bottom image: jt breaks off the marquis installation
hail proles, on the eve of mayday… for those of you who were not able to shell out the $35 or sneak into today’s art≠design symposium at the museum of design, the text and images presented, in a more formal package than was presented today, will soon be available in the features section. unfortunately, the witticisms and supreme ad-libbing contained in today’s oration, in which i called the room the symposium was held in ‘repugnant’, charged the people to ‘care about cinder block walls because some d00d spent a day of his life building it’, and said the taj mahal was ‘not a good building’, are lost forever, into the ether. next time y’all see dave webb you can ask him how much scenery was chew’d up thar. thanks to the folks i met, ecpk (east coast pk (perry kirk)), and the lightroom d00d (kevin byrd), and thanks again to laura moody for her help these past few months!
are you going to break off a post about the new feature? the image captions are sweet: ‘atlanta (unrealized)’
link
in addition, that “phe from creative loafing” was there. it is safe to say she does not give a rat’s ass (contrary to the assurances of ghousewalker) about our work or anything besides her catchy name. i guess you can save your “we work like witchfinder general rocks” for publishing cogs you already have under your thumb, like mzeiger?
link
[...] re article format for you. you may find, consume, and copy the piece here. as noted in a prior post, a certain silver tongue’d ease that accompanied the live f [...]
link
[...] re article format for you. you may find, consume, and copy the piece here. as noted in a prior post, a certain silver tongue’d ease that accompanied the live f [...]
link
they are ‘trackbacks’; whenever some netphe w/ wp posts a link to a post of ours, an excerpt of their post automatically appears w/ our post as a comment. confusing? i noticed ‘your’ post w/ an excessively long by line (it was the title of our page), and i edited it to ‘john’, thinking that it had been a ‘mistake’. i don’t think we need to trackback our own site, and so we may delete ‘your’ comment?
link

You must be logged in to post a comment.

09h34m39
01.May.2005