search:

the work.group home


attn snake oil shoppers!



worker: jt
30.Apr.2005
20h01m32
tagged: , ,

work.group imagetop image: jt explains am/pm’s ‘banal urban series’

 

work.group imagebottom image: jt breaks off the marquis installation

 

hail proles, on the eve of mayday… for those of you who were not able to shell out the $35 or sneak into today’s art≠design symposium at the museum of design, the text and images presented, in a more formal package than was presented today, will soon be available in the features section. unfortunately, the witticisms and supreme ad-libbing contained in today’s oration, in which i called the room the symposium was held in ‘repugnant’, charged the people to ‘care about cinder block walls because some d00d spent a day of his life building it’, and said the taj mahal was ‘not a good building’, are lost forever, into the ether. next time y’all see dave webb you can ask him how much scenery was chew’d up thar. thanks to the folks i met, ecpk (east coast pk (perry kirk)), and the lightroom d00d (kevin byrd), and thanks again to laura moody for her help these past few months!

 


ashley
09h34m39
01.May.2005

what are we looking at here?


link


john
08h50m57
02.May.2005

those would be some photos of me presenting our work.


link


ashley
12h11m42
02.May.2005

people are trying to figure out what is being displayed on the screen; is that a ‘collage’?


link


john
13h28m45
02.May.2005

see elaboration in initial post.


link


john
17h27m57
02.May.2005

updated link info for ecpk.


link


ashley
10h23m34
04.May.2005

are you going to break off a post about the new feature? the image captions are sweet: ‘atlanta (unrealized)’


link


john
10h55m06
04.May.2005

not just yet, the text needs some exercise.


link


john
22h56m43
04.May.2005

in addition, that “phe from creative loafing” was there. it is safe to say she does not give a rat’s ass (contrary to the assurances of ghousewalker) about our work or anything besides her catchy name. i guess you can save your “we work like witchfinder general rocks” for publishing cogs you already have under your thumb, like mzeiger?


link


john
23h39m33
04.May.2005

[...] re article format for you. you may find, consume, and copy the piece here. as noted in a prior post, a certain silver tongue’d ease that accompanied the live f [...]


link


[...] re article format for you. you may find, consume, and copy the piece here. as noted in a prior post, a certain silver tongue’d ease that accompanied the live f [...]


link


john
13h37m29
06.May.2005

what are those two previous comments? i didnt post that one!


link


ashley
16h41m56
06.May.2005

they are ‘trackbacks’; whenever some netphe w/ wp posts a link to a post of ours, an excerpt of their post automatically appears w/ our post as a comment. confusing? i noticed ‘your’ post w/ an excessively long by line (it was the title of our page), and i edited it to ‘john’, thinking that it had been a ‘mistake’. i don’t think we need to trackback our own site, and so we may delete ‘your’ comment?


link


file

leave comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.


top
rawr! the work.group: about | contact | news ||| workers lounge: log in | site map |