search:

the work.group home


schematic prepositional threads



worker: jt
21.Nov.2005
00h26m00
tagged: , , , , ,

work.group image this drawing takes various formal icons culled from the conducting bodies drawings and begans to strew them across the site, overlapping and interspersing diverse functions and giving initial prepositional strings to thread them into one another. this one is specious in its consistency and grounding to previous discussed principles, but i just wanted to take a first stab at something, to ‘work through some things,’ and i will try to be less fast and loose in the future.

 

also might be interesting to drum up a discussion about the role or position of the renwick ruins in the project.

 


john
14h35m56
23.Nov.2005

those vignettes in conducting bodies are synecdochic components of greater programmatic spaces. they are icons, spatial punctuation that guides and shifts movement through and past spaces but also gives individual frames from which to perceive other objects and the spaces they compose. what then, drives the organization of the icons? what sort of grammatic narrative? and how is it composed. i am composing some sequences to weave together, or leave as potential sequences (stranger’s paths) in text space or on the island. these prepositional sequences begin from each conducting body, but contain others. they in turn, could be woven into a fabric of relationships by overlaying and sprawling out from singularities (theater, box office, event hall) in each sequence, with chance and redundancy (perhaps installing more ruins on the island, or painting studios in the middle of the theater, we shall see). see following.


link


john
14h38m03
23.Nov.2005

work.group image theater

. (within theater), down – through stage [toward 34th street] – out onto outdoor theater [east river around] up across through outdoor gallery [despite ruin], (up – amidst gallery).


link


john
15h06m44
23.Nov.2005

work.group image stage

- upon stage – up round between theater, [toward williamsburg bridge] past ((dressing rooms above and beside) regarding) outdoor theater across -


link


john
15h31m48
23.Nov.2005

work.group image dressing rooms

. (behind dressing room), out from [regarding chrysler building versus ruins beyond] down beside outdoor theater – up through stage – out [toward ruin] against apartments above.


link


john
15h44m12
23.Nov.2005

work.group image blackbox theater

- [williamsburg bridge beyond through] down in blackbox theater, up despite theater above – round (amidst painting studios) [toward queensboro bridge] except sculpture studios (above art gallery).


link


john
16h02m35
23.Nov.2005

work.group image outdoor theater

. up upon outdoor theater [east river around] – down beneath [toward 34th street] along within outdoor gallery [beneath manhattanville skyline] – up, along amid event hall round, regarding the dressing rooms [excluding the united nations secretariat] by means of out onto stage -


link


john
17h01m53
23.Nov.2005

work.group image art gallery

- into art gallery [amidst queens versus manhattanville skylines], up throughout painting studios [despite ruins versus sculpture studios], down between event hall [against ruins round] across outdoor gallery across beyond [toward east river] -


link


john
17h17m56
23.Nov.2005

work.group image painting studios

- near amidst painting studios – out (over outdoor gallery) via cafe [[against moai in addition to dressing rooms] toward queensboro bridge] (opposite art gallery).


link


john
22h38m59
23.Nov.2005

work.group image sculpture studios

. within sculpture studio [sky versus ruins around], down past (sculpture studios near, opposite) by means of ruins – amidst art gallery – across, down into outdoor gallery round [toward queensboro bridge], (between dressing rooms regarding cafe nearby) -


link


john
22h59m52
23.Nov.2005

work.group image printmaking studio

. down out of printmaking studio [in place of sky], over across art gallery below via outdoor gallery beside [toward queensboro bridge] past dressing rooms throughout – onto cafe along [toward ruins] -


link


john
00h30m13
24.Nov.2005

work.group image photolab

. (within photolab), out from underneath event hall until ruins, round to back of art gallery [amidst studios above [except chrysler building]] against apartments.


link


john
00h32m03
24.Nov.2005

event hall

- from amidst event hall to *** -


link


john
00h40m42
24.Nov.2005

work.group image cafe

. in front of cafe [before ferry depot [toward queensboro bridge]] – down into outdoor gallery [beneath east river] – up between near art gallery plus event hall beyond [except ruins] -


link


john
00h46m34
24.Nov.2005

work.group image offices

. within office [regarding chrysler building versus ruins] out near box office (amidst dressing rooms), between into art gallery below, around (along apartments) [[toward williamsburg bridge] except sculpture studios] -


link


john
00h51m25
24.Nov.2005

work.group image computer lab

- amidst computer lab – down into art gallery [despite ruins] – across photolabs below until offices [in place of queensboro bridge]


link


john
00h53m24
24.Nov.2005

work.group image box office

according to box office, theater above throughout [around through event hall]


link


john
00h55m08
24.Nov.2005

work.group image apartments

. (within apartments) – painting studios plus sculpture studios around [except east river] -


link


john
00h56m00
24.Nov.2005

ok… now the plan should be done! (?) im going to celebrate bullshit thanksgiving…


link


Mariam
10h47m35
25.Nov.2005

Might we perhaps ignore the ruins? Maybe only for awhile?
Also, I like the idea of sequence, but maybe not so forced?


link


ashley
17h43m34
26.Nov.2005

is inhabitation of the ruins optional? i would be interested in some apparatus which allows visitors to view inside and pass through the ruins, without affecting its habitat, like that underwater viewing area y’all have in your new aquarium, jt.


link


john
17h16m46
27.Nov.2005

i agree that the idea of sequence and happenstance or adhoc movement could be viewed as antithetical. i too am wary of this. i believe that we don’t have a very strong organizational framework, and very little discussion about what this center is wont to acheive, so in the absence of such a principles, i am cultivating a network of relationships between the spaces, which one may note, fluctuate from sequence to sequence, sometimes one thing is in one relationship to another and then the whole thing flipped recto verso. i believe that as a base, these narrative threads can serve to provide a woven condition of ‘paths’ that can be tailored to the needs of the estranged pilot through ideas of triangulation, assumption, and form. these ‘primary’ or embedded paths i perceive as loose, one’s that, as the “stranger’s path” posed earlier, are lost within a fabric, yet stand out through their recognizable trajectories. the idea of complete chance i see as anathema to the principles of universal design.

i was assuming we would use the ruins rhetorically, as dead ends or pregnant pauses in the movement system, whatever architectural solution solves “up… despite ruins.” glass tunnels with kidnap’d whale sharks would suffice.


link


ashley
23h59m52
28.Nov.2005

i don’t know if this is a stab in the right direction at this stage, but i thought that we might extend the use of narrative to include a cast of characters whose stories describe trips to and uses of southpoint that can be mapped; maybe this is unnecessary, and there is already an explanation on this site as to where those threads/bundles come from?

character; home; visit:

  • single mother, 38, and three (3) children; upper upper east side; annual fighting-kite event.
  • male, 51, and female, 45; upper west side; one (1) gallery opening of sonic installations.
  • nuclear family, queens; two (2) trips each summer for outdoor activities.
  • single male, 20; brooklyn; visits daily for internship in gallery offices.
  • single female, 25; southpoint; syrian page in united nations.
  • married female, 36; upper roosevelt island; weekly domestic shopping.
  • single male, 32, and single male, 32; queens; fish from eastern shore weekly.
  • single male, 48; connecticut; takes hour lunch from coler.goldwater.
  • student, 23; lower east side; maintains printmaking studio.

if this is successful, i may make a new post w/ this list, and the stories can be added from there.

i also took ‘ruin’ to be figurative; i tried to hint at ruins/relics in my conducting bodies. notwithstanding the apparent piss-poor job i have done at that, i think ‘they’ want us to deal w/ those ruins in a very literal sense?


link


john
09h07m57
29.Nov.2005

i tried to hint at ruins/relics in my conducting bodies… i think ‘they’ want us to deal w/ those ruins in a very literal sense?

i think it is both, you may have noticed that i included moais in my sections. also, i guess there is the projection that some of these parts of the buildings will fall dormant and ‘ruined’ when they are made into islands or whathaveyou. i think we should have some stance on the renwick ruins, whether it is ‘realistic’ or ‘literal’ or not. i see it as rhetorical dead weight.

i think the character idea is tight. how do you think we could mesh it with my previous exercise? i am doing drawings right now of those textual ‘sections’ to cultivate a network of physical relationships. perhaps this is too architectural, but i think it would help as a backdrop or underlay for such incursions. even marquis had the u.s. map as a set of constraints for its whimsy.


link


Mariam
09h30m20
29.Nov.2005

I am reluctant about the ‘character idea’. I agree that it is critical to consider various arrangements..
It seems too myopic.


link


john
13h13m00
30.Nov.2005

watch threads above for corresponding drawing updates. all drawings will be oriented with the long axis of the island horizontal on the page.


link


john
15h18m52
01.Dec.2005

ok, that is all the threads. now i guess i will try to weave them together. comments, questions, contributions? still working on the conducting bodies master drawing as well.

ashley, i was thinking the ‘skins’ that are being done on the conducting bodies would finally occur in the master drawing, but i realize at this point such a venture is not feasible as the drawing exists in real life taped to my workbench, so excelsior to your continued interventions on the 4x6s.


link


file

leave comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.


top
rawr! the work.group: about | contact | news ||| workers lounge: log in | site map |