scomesport transmissions
publius/3 (7:22:44 PM): in brief, i state that the 'in between' zones are fragmented and spread across the city, some zoSC-,rG~.~.l rh a nail head
toastmaster (7:23:25 PM): but is our way of working analogous to what we find in the city?
publius/3 (7:23:32 PM): the placement of these zones is impossible to predict,
publius/3 (7:23:47 PM): since they coulf feasibly be everywhere at some point
publius/3 (7:23:51 PM): could
toastmaster (7:24:16 PM): but do they arise from certain factors?
publius/3 (7:24:17 PM): therefore, there is nothing to 'create' that would not eventually 'suffer' the same fate
toastmaster (7:24:24 PM): mhmm
publius/3 (7:24:36 PM): as the spaces we are trying to save
publius/3 (7:24:57 PM): have they said when the cenobites are going to arrive in manhattan?
publius/3 (7:25:46 PM): when manhattan seceded from the union, who guessed we would be forced to harvest crops in the streets
toastmaster (7:26:52 PM): so have we been artificially enacting this process in our work?
publius/3 (7:27:15 PM): that was part of the necessity, i believe
toastmaster (7:27:20 PM): mhmm
publius/3 (7:27:27 PM): we each worked on the city,
publius/3 (7:27:43 PM): w/o knowing what the othnU(J'~r~ to add or subtract
toastmaster (7:27:57 PM): so unless we clue them into this process, it may just look like a confused mess
toastmaster (7:28:00 PM): w (h 00 is
toastmaster (7:28:27 PM): as is
publius/3 (7:28:46 PM): to me the whole idea of theirs that a bldg's future can be anticipated and provided for is absurd,
publius/3 (7:29:12 PM): and in fact the most cherished bldgs are the ones which can be reoriented
toastmaster (7:29:22 PM): agreed
publius/3 (7:29:23 PM): or scrubbed partly clean and re-written
toastmaster (7:30:07 PM): i agree with you on all these fronts!
publius/3 (7:30:15 PM): the french fukks who built notre-dame de paris prb. did not anticipate that it would be used for storing livestock during the revolution
publius/3 (7:30:27 PM): but that is the coolest function of it so far
publius/3 (7:30:54 PM): (except its job as a pedestal for a viollet le duc statue)
publius/3 (7:31:27 PM): maybe a white panel
toastmaster (7:31:39 PM): hmm
publius/3 (7:31:55 PM): with the words 'touche s'il vous plais'
toastmaster (7:32:16 PM): hmm
publius/3 (7:32:27 PM): black then?
publius/3 (7:32:28 PM): no!
publius/3 (7:32:32 PM): 'latte'
publius/3 (7:32:49 PM): the bgcolor of the universe.
publius/3 (7:33:18 PM): .universe { background-color: latte; }
publius/3 (6:04:10 PM): to be somewhat specific
toastmaster (6:04:13 PM): ok
publius/3 (6:04:14 PM): i figure that person A has a plan about how something is ----g to be built,
publius/3 (6:04:36 PM): person B comes along and adds something adjacent/on top of
publius/3 (6:04:46 PM): that doesn't derail the plans of person A,
toastmaster (6:04:46 PM): ok
toastmaster (6:05:07 PM): preach o~
publius/3 (6:05:34 PM): but slightly affects the perhaps 'vision' of person A
publius/3 (6:06:08 PM): in these cases, person A/B could be neighbor/neighbor
publius/3 (6:06:12 PM): staker/shifter
toastmaster (6:06:17 PM): mhmm
publius/3 (6:06:35 PM): inhab/squatter
toastmaster (6:06:38 PM): so you see the glitch as a collaborative constructive, a series of concessions?
publius/3 (6:06:40 PM): island/inhab
publius/3 (6:07:00 PM): i think that the 'problem' is that they are usually non-negotiated
publius/3 (6:07:05 PM): at least on 1 side
toastmaster (6:07:13 PM): or is it when C comes along
toastmaster (6:07:15 PM):and has to use the system that A and B have fukked up
publius/3 (6:07:16 PM): well, always on at least 1 side,
publius/3 (6:07:21 PM): sometimes on both sides
publius/3 (6:07:55 PM): i think then that A/B >> A ; C >> B
toastmaster (6:08:28 PM): huh?
publius/3 (6:08:59 PM): there is no 'C'
publius/3 (6:09:07 PM): when 'c' is introduced,
toastmaster (6:09:12 PM): how do you figure?
publius/3 (6:09:20 PM): then a+b become the role of 'a'
publius/3 (6:09:29 PM): and c becomes be
publius/3 (6:09:32 PM): b
toastmaster (6:09:37 PM): hmm
publius/3 (6:09:43 PM): or, to put another way
toastmaster (6:09:45 PM): so it is just a loop
publius/3 (6:09:55 PM): C is to A/B what B is to A
toastmaster (6:10:01 PM): right right
publius/3 (6:10:20 PM): C, A/B :: B, A
toastmaster (6:10:31 PM): but i think that an urban glitch can only be read when there was first and a/b
toastmaster (6:10:44 PM): the initial concession is not a glitch
publius/3 (6:11:06 PM): well, from the point of view from A,
publius/3 (6:11:14 PM): the initial work of B is a glitch
toastmaster (6:11:18 PM): hmm
publius/3 (6:11:34 PM): B would see A as an inco
publius/3 (6:11:54 PM): but B would not see any glitches in the 'collaboration',
toastmaster (6:12:11 PM): but i think a glitch is something that -ffects someone outside of that circle
publius/3 (6:12:13 PM): because B would assume that B did the smoothest addition
toastmaster (6:12:15 PM): -,- vects the system
toastmaster (6:12:19 PM): which is the city
publius/3 (6:12:31 PM): right... that's what i see as A
publius/3 (6:12:36 PM): where B = the citizens
toastmaster (6:12:42 PM): ah
publius/3 (8:48:38 AM): i just heard an ad for tasty bite on pirade
publius/3 (8:48:57 AM): promising the healthy vegan treat
publius/3 (8:49:40 AM): Jodhpur Lentils(Kosher/Vegan)
toastmaster (8:50:13 AM): im sure you have a cache of that in your squat
publius/3 (8:54:09 AM): ??
toastmaster (8:55:46 AM): do you think this makes any sense?
publius/3 (8:55:53 AM): no
toastmaster (8:55:56 AM): ok
toastmaster (8:56:00 AM): then that looks good
toastmaster (8:57:21 AM): jesus
toastmaster (8:58:25 AM): i am trying to choose text_b as a the full 800x600 bg and then put the three untouched images on it in small formats
toastmaster (8:58:51 AM): i am just telling you since it looks like gimp has crashed
publius/3 (8:59:12 AM): ok
publius/3 (8:59:26 AM): the three original images?
toastmaster (8:59:39 AM): yes
toastmaster (8:59:42 AM): ok its back
toastmaster (8:59:43 AM): hang on
publius/3 (9:02:56 AM): jc
publius/3 (9:03:05 AM): i am so hungry i am about to vomit
publius/3 (9:03:47 AM): my body is trying to eject the acid accruing before it dissolves my stomach walls
toastmaster (9:03:53 AM): you didnt go to the coop?
publius/3 (9:03:56 AM): no
publius/3 (9:04:02 AM): there are rumours of a taint in the food stores
toastmaster (9:07:03 AM): it is not so magical
toastmaster (9:07:20 AM): but i think it is fairly illustrative of the action
toastmaster (9:08:05 AM): hmm
publius/3 (9:08:14 AM): that wasn't what you first sent me
toastmaster (9:08:16 AM): does it matter?
publius/3 (9:08:18 AM): it can't be helped
